non-evidence-based
|non-ev-i-dence-based|
🇺🇸
/ˌnɑnˈɛvɪdənsˌbeɪst/
🇬🇧
/ˌnɒnˈɛvɪdənsˌbeɪst/
not supported by evidence
Etymology
'non-evidence-based' originates from English components: the prefix 'non-' ultimately from Latin 'non' meaning 'not', combined with 'evidence' (from Old French 'evidence' and Latin 'evidentia') and 'based' from 'base' (Old French/Latin/Greek roots, e.g. Latin/Gk 'basis').
'non-evidence-based' developed by adding the negative prefix 'non-' to the modern compound 'evidence-based', a phrase that became common in late 20th-century medical and policy discourse; the negative form emerged to label practices lacking empirical support.
Initially a straightforward negation ('not evidence-based'), the term has evolved into a critical label used in medicine, public policy, and science communication to denote practices or claims lacking credible empirical support.
Meanings by Part of Speech
Adjective 1
not supported by, derived from, or founded on scientific evidence or rigorous empirical research; lacking empirical support.
The clinic offered several non-evidence-based treatments that had not been tested in controlled studies.
Synonyms
Antonyms
Last updated: 2025/10/26 17:06
