non-equivalence
|non-equiv-a-lence|
🇺🇸
/ˌnɑnɪˈkwɪv(ə)ləns/
🇬🇧
/ˌnɒnɪˈkwɪv(ə)ləns/
lack of equivalence
Etymology
'non-equivalence' originates from Modern English as a compound of the prefix 'non-' and the noun 'equivalence'. The prefix 'non-' ultimately comes from Latin 'non', meaning 'not', and 'equivalence' derives from Latin 'aequivalentia' (via Old French/Medieval Latin), where 'aequi-' meant 'equal' and 'valere' meant 'to be worth or have value'.
'equivalence' changed from Latin 'aequivalentia' into Medieval/Old French forms and then into Middle English 'equivalence'; the negative prefix 'non-' has been used in English since Old/Middle English as a borrowing from Latin/Old French. The modern compound 'non-equivalence' is a relatively recent formation in technical and academic English, combining these elements to express a negative state.
Initially the components denoted 'not' and 'equal in value'; over time the compound has come to be used broadly in mathematics, logic, translation studies, and other fields to mean a general 'lack of equivalence' rather than a narrow monetary or value-based inequality.
Meanings by Part of Speech
Noun 1
the state or condition of not being equivalent; lack of equivalence between two or more things.
The non-equivalence of the two models meant they produced different results under the same conditions.
Synonyms
Antonyms
Last updated: 2025/12/10 15:06
